Borden & Selleck Co. v. Fraser & Chalmers
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action of assumpsit. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward O. Brown, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
Plaintiff complains that the judgment was erroneous in failing to allow interest, and in charging it with the cost of reboring the second wheel, which was done pursuant to an agreement made directly between the defendant and the manufacturer of the engine.
It is contended in behalf of the defendant that plaintifi' did not comply with the terms of the original contract to furnish a complete engine; that the second fly-wheel was necessary to that end because of the defect in the first; that plaintiff is, therefore, properly chargeable with the cost of the second wheel and all the expense…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doane v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Kohl v. LindleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Peoria Grape Sugar Co. v. TurneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Ramming v. CaldwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Archdale v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harry Alter Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Colchord Machinery Co. v. Loy-Wilson Foundry & Machinery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908