Legal Opinion
Comeau v. Rupp
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 13, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 86-1531-BPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on review of a magistrate’s order. (Doc. 839). The court has previously set forth the essential facts of this dispute. 762 F.Supp. 1434, 1437-38 (per Theis, J.).
The court reviews a magistrate’s order under the terms of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). As to nondispositive pretrial matters, the district court reviews the magistrate’s order under a “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review. Ocelot Oil Corp. v. Sparrow Industries, 847 F.2d 1458, 1461-62 (10th Cir.1988). Under this standard, the court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Detection Systems, Inc. v. Pittway Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Ariza v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Creative Gifts, Inc. v. UFODistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
- Epperly v. Lehmann Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.