Legal Opinion

Warthen v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1992No. 60A01-9108-CR-256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Rodney J. Warthen . appeals his conviction for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a Class A misdemeanor. 1 He raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred when it gave Final Jury Instruction No. 8 regarding the rebuttable presumption that the result of Warthen's subsequent blood alcohol test related back to the time he operated the vehicle.

II. Whether Final Jury Instruction No. 8 impermissibly failed to advise the jury that the presumption was both permissive and rebuttable.

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACT…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Street v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hurt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Chilcutt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Mordacq v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duren v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. StammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API