Warthen v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Rodney J. Warthen . appeals his conviction for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a Class A misdemeanor. 1 He raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred when it gave Final Jury Instruction No. 8 regarding the rebuttable presumption that the result of Warthen's subsequent blood alcohol test related back to the time he operated the vehicle.
II. Whether Final Jury Instruction No. 8 impermissibly failed to advise the jury that the presumption was both permissive and rebuttable.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACT…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Street v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Hurt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chilcutt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mordacq v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duren v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. StammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.