Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Suozzi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 6, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., *379J.), entered on or about April 9, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion to disqualify defendants-respondents’ attorneys, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action for breach of contract, fraud, and mutual mistake of fact in the sale of real property, plaintiff claims that when he purchased the building in 1987, he was under the misapprehension that all of the apartments therein were rent stabilized, when in fact some were rent controlled (see, Martinez v Suozzi, 173 AD2d 411). Defendants-respondents…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kupplungsbau GmbH v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Intercontinental Credit Corp. v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Martinez v. SuozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sokolow, Dunaud, Mercadier & Carreras LLP v. LacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Broadwhite Associates v. TruongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Grassini v. ParavalosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Herald v. HeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. C.A. Shea & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.