Legal Opinion
Ross v. Foremost Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 11, 2010PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
OTT, J.:
¶ 1 Daniel F. Ross appeals from the order entered on February 23, 2009 granting a motion for summary judgment filed by Sentry Services, Inc. (“Sentry”) and dismissing his complaint. After careful review, we affirm.
¶ 2 In April of 2001, Ross purchased a 1984 Travel Trailer, a wheeled, 35 feet long by eight feet wide, licensed trailer that could be pulled on the open highway by a hitch. After purchasing the trailer, he secured insurance coverage from Foremost Insurance Company (“Foremost”), through an insurance agent, Sentry. Ross selected Sentry because he wanted Foremost…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Tonkovic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BullockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Mamalis v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Richmond v. McHaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Boehm, R. v. Riversource Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- In re JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Fazio v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.