Legal Opinion

Holland v. Murray

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2021-0567Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHEAL W. BUCKNER et al, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-567 (TJK) PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs allege they are the trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, a pension plan that provides retirement benefits to tens of thousands of retired coal miners and their surviving spouses. They claim that Defendants owe the trust roughly $6.5 billion because of Defendants’ corporate relationships with Murray Holdings, a large…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API