Legal Opinion

Love v. Hall

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 14, 2006No. 2040834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from a judgment entered in favor of an attorney against a former client on the attorney's claim for payment, based upon the doctrine of quantum meruit, for the reasonable value of services rendered before termination of the attorney's representation.

In April 2004, Anna Love ("the client") was injured in an automobile collision involving a driver insured by Progressive Insurance Company ("Progressive"); at that time, Alfa Mutual Insurance Company ("Alfa") insured the client as to bodily injuries and property damage incurred as a result of uninsured and underinsured…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Van Schaack v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Lanier v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Huntley v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Anderson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madison County Department of Human Resources v. T.S. Ex Rel. F.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Madison County Department of Human Resources v. T.S. Ex Rel. F.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API