Kron v. Bodmer
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for malicious prosecution. At the close of all of the testimony the defendant moved the court for a directed verdict in his favor, which motion was denied and a verdict returned by the jury for the plaintiff. Thereafter the defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied, the motion for a new trial was granted and the defendant appeals from the order denying motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
It is the contention of appellant, first that probable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Michael v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodenburg Law Firm v. SiraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019