Legal Opinion

Kron v. Bodmer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1933No. File No. 6183PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for malicious prosecution. At the close of all of the testimony the defendant moved the court for a directed verdict in his favor, which motion was denied and a verdict returned by the jury for the plaintiff. Thereafter the defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied, the motion for a new trial was granted and the defendant appeals from the order denying motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

It is the contention of appellant, first that probable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  4. Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Michael v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodenburg Law Firm v. SiraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API