Legal Opinion
Perez v. 222 Sutter Street Partners
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 2, 1990No. A046821PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
We decide in this case that a trustee under a deed of trust in nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings has no duty under Civil Code section 2924b to give notice of default to affected easement holders unless they have specially requested notice. On that basis, we will uphold summary judgment granted in favor of trustees under the wills of Julie B. and Louis J. Lalanne (Trustees), who brought this quiet-title/declaratory relief action against 222 Sutter Street Partners, a California limited partnership (Partners), to determine Partners’ rights in a claimed easement for light and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Martinez v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Diamond Benefits Life Ins. Co. v. TrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mayer v. C.W. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Homestead Savings v. DarmientoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Diediker v. Peelle Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.