Legal Opinion

BRITO v. BERRYHILL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2020No. 5:19-cv-02160Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASCUNCION BRITO, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : ANDREW M. SAUL, : No. 19-2160 Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Timothy R. Rice June 29, 2020 U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Ascunsion Brito moves to alter my Order of April 28, 2020 (doc. 28), which denied her motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Pl. Mot. (doc. 30). Brito argues the Commissioner’s unconstitutional pre- litigation actions require me to find the government’s litigation position was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API