Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2010No. 08-4378PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Defendanb-Appellant Reginald Smith unsuccessfully sought to suppress evidence of a handgun taken from him by Cincinnati police officers as he was leaving an apartment building in Over-the-Rhine, Cincinnati at approximately 3:00 a.m. on November 21, 2006. The officers encountered Smith in the entrance hallway of the apartment building while responding to a 911 emergency call. The record reflects that Smith was not seized until Officer Putnick told him to stop and, at that point, the officers had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that he had been engaged in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Katrina LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Robinson v. HowesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Ramone AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API