Legal Opinion

Suman v. Gagel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1940No. 1634Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff and dismissing the petition.

Plaintiff’s action was for damages for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by her when she fell from a common landing which it was claimed had been permitted to become in a state of disrepair by her landlord. Issues were drawn and the cause came on to trial to judge and jury.

Plaintiff’s counsel in his opening statement, among other things, said,

“We shall prove or attempt to prove that about seven weeks prior to the time of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. City of Richmond v. MulhollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Miller v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Dempsey v. SeibelOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Panosetti v. FroshOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API