Panosetti v. Frosh

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

The facts are comparatively simple but counsel for the parties, in oral argument and upon the briefs, have presented with unusual care the several propositions of law involved. The pertinent Ohio authorities are cited as well as many cases from ■ jurisdiction throughout the United States and Canada. We are under obligation to counsel for the painstaking and thorough manner in which they have undertaken to assist the court in determining the questions presented.

We are required, as was the trial court, to give to the evidenc of the plaintiff the most favorable…