Legal Opinion

Chrichlow v. Sipple

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 7, 2022No. 7:18-cv-03222Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN DAMION CRICHLOW, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -against- 18-CV-03222 (PMH) ACTING COMMISSIONER ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI DOCCS, et al., Defendants. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Kevin Damion Crichlow (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, is a chronic litigant known to the federal courts throughout New York State.1 The Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”)—the operative pleading, representing Plaintiff’s fourth attempt at satisfying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) since this case was first filed in April…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API