Legal Opinion

Swift v. Hale & Covington Real Estate Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 14, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*447Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay —

Reversing.

The Hale and Covington Eeal Estate Company sued 0. H. Swift to recover a commission of $600.00. From >a verdict and judgment in their favor, Swift appeals.

The facts are these: On September 15, 1919, Swift entered into a contract with the Hale and Covington Eeal Estate Company by which he gave them the exclusive privilege of selling or trading an 18 acre farm, located in G-raves county. The contract provided that the sale should net Swift $13,000.00 and that' the firm should receive as a commission all that the property brought over that sum. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jepsen v. MarohnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Pope v. CaddellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Gore v. Griffith Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. DorseySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Lovejoy v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Orr v. WoolfolkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Howe v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API