Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary Apker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1999No. 96-2384PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Chief Judge.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. See Apker v. United States, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2339, 141 L.Ed.2d 710 (1998), vacating and remanding 101 F.3d 75 (8th Cir.1996), opinion vacated and mandate recalled, 156 F.3d 1344 (8th Cir.1998). We are instructed to further consider the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion of Gary Apker in light of Holm v. United States, 524 U.S. 236, 118 S.Ct. 1969, 141 L.Ed.2d 242 (1998), in which the Government conceded that a § 2255 motion alleging a Bailey error amounted to a constitutional claim for the purposes of 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Vincent Edward Fields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Jerry J. Latorre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Riley CarnahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Kelly Preston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Brian WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API