Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 1, 1934No. Docket No. 64360Published

1. Payment by taxpayer of a judgment for liability for death of another resulting from driving his automobile, held, under the circumstances, too remote to be deductible as a loss sustained in business. 2. Amounts received as consideration for mineral deeds in Oklahomaheld ordinary income and not capital gain.

1Opinion of the Court

FOREST ANDERSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Anderson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 64360.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

30 B.T.A. 597; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1299;

May 1, 1934, Promulgated

1. Payment by taxpayer of a judgment for liability for death of another resulting from driving his automobile, held, under the circumstances, too remote to be deductible as a loss sustained in business.

2. Amounts received as consideration for mineral deeds in Oklahomaheld ordinary income and not capital gain.

Stanley Suydam, Esq., for the petitioner.

James R. Johnson, Esq., for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Harmel v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  4. Anderson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  5. Murphy v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API