Legal Opinion

People v. Doherty

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 1986No. 85-0343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schnake

Following a hearing conducted pursuant to the implied-consent provisions of section 11—501.1 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 95^2, par. 11—501.1), the trial court found that the State had failed to produce evidence that the defendant refused to submit to a breathalyzer test and, thus, granted the defendant, Matthew Doherty, his motion to dismiss the State’s petition. The State appeals from that decision, contending that the trial court’s finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

At the hearing, Officer Petrick…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. RinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. RolfingsmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State Department of Motor Vehicles v. McElwainWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. SchuberthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People v. EllerbuschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GriffithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. People v. DotyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. BatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Keyaunna Hurley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API