Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Garnett

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 8, 1943No. 8322PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the refusal of the trial court to permit appellant (plaintiff in the court below) to file a third amended complaint in an action for malicious prosecution. The complaint charged in substance that the appellees (defendants below) had maliciously instigated a criminal prosecution on charges which they knew to be false, and had knowingly prepared and presented forged documents before the grand jury in order to obtain indictments. The complaint disclosed that the appellees were two United States attorneys and a police officer who had prepared and prosecuted the case which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Colpoys v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Melvin Carter v. John R. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShaneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Laughlin v. RosenmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API