Legal Opinion

Chiappetta v. Bahr

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 5, 2002No. 19551-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Hank Chiappetta’s car was hit by a driver attempting to elude police officers. Claiming injuries due to negligence, Mr. Chiappetta sued the driver who hit him, the officers pursuing the driver, and the City of Spokane. Trial was before a jury. During jury deliberations, various jurors allegedly made comments that indicated bias, that violated the jury instructions, and that injected evidence not elicited at trial. Mr. Chiappetta appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We find that the admissible portions of Mr. Chiappetta’s evidence do not support a claim of juror…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. BalisokWashington Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chiappetta v. BahrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Chiappetta v. BahrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Rebekah L. Hart v. Emily PratherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API