Seaman v. . Koehler
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 13, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon the plaintiff by a servant of the defendant’s testator.
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 13, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon the plaintiff by a servant of the defendant’s testator. At the time of the accident plaintiff was a conductor of an open street car drawn by horses in the city of Brooklyn. A truck alleged to belong to Herman Koehler the defendant’s…
1Opinion of the Court
Vann J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Bradley, J., not voting and Brown, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by39 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Baldwin v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Knust v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Landry v. OversenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- McKernan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.