Magwire v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, prosecutes this writ to review a judgment sentencing him to the penitentiary for a period of seven to nine years on a verdict of guilty of rape.
But four alleged errors need be considered: (1) The insufficiency of the evidence; (2) The refusal to give defendant’s instruction Ño. 5; (3) The refusal to give defendant’s instruction No. 6; (4) The giving of instruction No. 8%.
1. The information charged a common law rape. The evidence, as disclosed by the record, is far from satisfactory. Defendant was twenty-three years old and prosecutrix…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Rahke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Anderson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. TrustySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. RileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. Yoshio FutamataSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.