Legal Opinion

Magwire v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1925No. 11,029PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, prosecutes this writ to review a judgment sentencing him to the penitentiary for a period of seven to nine years on a verdict of guilty of rape.

But four alleged errors need be considered: (1) The insufficiency of the evidence; (2) The refusal to give defendant’s instruction Ño. 5; (3) The refusal to give defendant’s instruction No. 6; (4) The giving of instruction No. 8%.

1. The information charged a common law rape. The evidence, as disclosed by the record, is far from satisfactory. Defendant was twenty-three years old and prosecutrix…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Rahke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Anderson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. TrustySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. People v. RileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. People v. Yoshio FutamataSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API