Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Roehr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmundson, Justice

[¶ 1.] Contestants, heirs of the estate of their father, Ervin Roehr, appeal the trial court’s determination that certain land inherited from Ervin’s father was owned property pursuant to SDCL 29A-3-101, and subject to an option to purchase in Ervin’s will. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In June of 1974, Ervin Roehr drafted a will. Even though Ervin made no changes to this draft, he did not sign the will until March 11, 1975. Ervin’s will provided for an option to his son Don to buy “land I now own” at the price of $100 per acre. In a subsequent clause, Ervin’s will also provided that any land…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Matter of Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Estate of KlauzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Matter of Estate of LingscheitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Surat Farms, LLC v. Brule County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Tisdel v. Beadle County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hollman v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re Estate of OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API