Legal Opinion
Horton v. U.S. Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0548(PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
In this pro se action for a writ of habeas corpus, petitioner claims that the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”), upon revoking his parole in 2006, improperly rescinded credit for time he had served at the District of Columbia Jail. Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions and the entire record, the Court finds no grounds for issuing the writ. It therefore will deny the application and dismiss the case. 1
I. BACKGROUND
On August 30, 2002, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia sentenced petitioner to concurrent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Michael Ellis, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of ParoleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Washington v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012