Legal Opinion
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 2, 1992No. 92-5584Published
1Opinion of the Court
506 U.S. 1 (1992)
MARTIN
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS et al.
No. 92-5584.
United States Supreme Court.
Decided November 2, 1992.[*]
ON MOTION OF PETITIONER FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
2Per curiam
Pro se petitioner James L. Martin requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request pursuant to our Rule 39.8. Martin is allowed until November 23, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petitions in compliance with this Court's Rule 33. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zatko v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.