Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1973No. 58PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant, without citation of authority, contends that the trial judge erred by refusing to grant his motion to allow his counsel or his counsel’s representative to be present during summoning of the jury.

The regular panel of jurors was exhausted at approximately 11:00 a.m. on the second day of the trial. The trial judge thereupon ordered the Sheriff to summon ten supplemental jurors to report for service at two o’clock p.m. on that day.

G.S. 9-11 (a), in part, provides:

“Supplemental jurors; special venire.— (a) If necessary, the court may, without using the jury list, order…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API