Legal Opinion

Hoisington v. Brakey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Dickinson District Court. Replevin, brought by Jane Brakey against George Uoisington, as sheriff of Dickinson county. Judgment for plaintiff, at the October Term, 1883. Defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The facts in this case are substantially these: In January, 1881, George Hoisington, as sheriff of Dickinson county, levied upon one roan horse, one dark sorrel-chestnut horse, and two mules, as the property of John Brakey, the husband of Jane Brakey, under an execution in favor of C. H. and L. J. McCormick. Soon thereafter Jane Brakey replevied from Hoisington all the property, she claiming title thereto. This case was tried at the October term of the court for 1881, and resulted in a judgment for Hoisington. Within a few days after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beloit v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Gardner v. BuckbeeNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Bouchaud v. DiasNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  5. French v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Bell v. NilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Wells, Administrator v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Lux v. Columbian Fruit Canning Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API