Legal Opinion

Caddo Systems, Inc. v. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (AG)

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 9, 2022No. 1:20-cv-05927Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CADDO SYSTEMS, INC. and 511 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., No. 20 C 05927 Plaintiffs, Judge Thomas M. Durkin v. SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (AG) and SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Caddo Systems, Inc. and 511 Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “Caddo”) filed patent infringement claims against Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (AG) and Siemens Industry, Inc. (“SII”). Siemens AG moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.1 Caddo opposed and moved for leave to conduct expedited…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API