New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Dailey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Oliver Dailey against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff (167 Fed. 592), and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant as “hostler” at East Hartford, Conn. After an engine had come in from a run it was his duty to see that it was supplied with water, coal and sand and placed in a stall at the roundhouse until needed for the next run. The roundhouse was of the usual construction, built in a semicircle around a circular turntable, which, after the engine was placed upon it, was turned until the track on the turntable *290registered with the track leading to the stall in the roundhouse where the engine was to be placed.' The stalls were- separated…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boston & M. R. Co. v. GokeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford v. Rock Island Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Hogan v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- New York, C. & St. L. R. v. BouldenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Hogan v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1912