Legal Opinion
New York, C. & St. L. R. v. Boulden
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 10, 1933No. 4848PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge
(after stating
the facts as above).
The complaint is in three paragraphs and their differences which are slight relate to the charges of negligence. Appellee testified that the accident was caused by striking his foot against the post, and from this fact it is quite obvious that the negligence relied upon was in permitting the post to protrude above the cinders. Hence the questions presented for our consideration are: (1) Whether there was negligence in permitting the post to protrude above the cinders; and (2), if so, whether it was so normal an incident to appellee’s employment or so clearly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- McLean v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. KoskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis v. FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- TM Doyle Teaming Co., Inc. v. FreelsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. BervenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- John Robert Shaw, as of the Estate of Anthony Alma Rahner, Deceased v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.