Legal Opinion
United States v. Palmer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLANCY, District Judge.
The complaint alleges that the defendants made a promissory note in the sum of $608 to the order of The National City Bank of New York on December 2, 1935; that the note' was executed in accordance with the provisions of the National Housing Act, 48 Stat. 1246; that the sum se cured by it was payable in thirty-six equal monthly installments; that a default occurred which accelerated payment of the note; that thereupon, the United States reimbursed The National City Bank of New York to the extent of $527.85 and that the note was then assigned to the Federal Housing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McCollum v. Hamilton National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Investment Company Institute v. CampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Horzepa v. DauskiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941