State v. Walker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, over his objection and motion to suppress, the money and lottery tickets taken from his automobile without a search warrant.
Evidence obtained by an unreasonable search is inadmissible in both federal and state courts. U. S. Const., Amend. IV and V; N. C. Const., Art. I, § 20; Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) ; State v. Simmons, 278 N.C. 468, 180 S.E. 2d 97 (1971). However, it is equally well-settled that when contraband material is in plain view no search is necessary and the constitutional guarantee against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. CraddockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976