Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Harlan
These cases present a narrow question of statutory construction, upon which differing views might reasonably be entertained. I cannot, however, agree that the position now adopted by the Court will satisfactorily achieve the purposes evidently sought by Congress in 1959. I therefore respectfully dissent.
The scope of judicial review of administrative action is, of course, governed principally by the terms and purposes of the underlying statutory system. Compare generally 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.03 (1958); Jaffe, Judicial Review: Question of Law, 69 Harv. L. Rev. 239; Jaffe,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Marcus Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
- Kentucky Utilities Company v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967