Legal Opinion
Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 15, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 4861PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Kentucky Utilities Company, hereafter referred to as KU, seeks injunctive relief against defendants, Tennessee Valley Authority, hereafter referred to as TVA, Powell Valley Electric Cooperative, hereafter referred to as Powell Valley, Edward J. Hardin, Individually and as Mayor of Tazewell, Tennessee, and James B. DeBusk, Individually and as Mayor of New Tazewell, Tennessee, to prevent them from taking or attempting to take its electric customers in the area of Tazewell and New Tazewell, Claiborne County, Tennessee, and also a judgment for damages for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Northern States Power Co. v. Rural Electrification AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1965
- Alabama Power Company v. Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.