Legal Opinion
Stover v. Bruntz
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 1, 2017No. C077206PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, Acting P.J.
*22Appellant Eileen G. Bruntz and respondent Russell E. Stover share two children and years of acrimony-fueled court contests following the demise of their romantic relationship. Bruntz challenges several *554orders related to Stover's alleged failure over the ensuing years to fully pay $1,000 in monthly child support under an April 2007 support order, which contains a contested stipulated retroactivity provision.
She contends the court erred in (1) awarding Stover a child care credit of $441 per month from January 2007 to May 2011 because no motion to modify had been filed during that time; (2)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Duarte v. Chino Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Nelson v. Avondale Homeowners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- S.C. v. G.S., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Briggs v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Gobron v. Pesheva CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Gonzalez v. The Vapor Trail CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Kali v. Young CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.