Updegrove v. Updegrove
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In Error. On a writ of error to tbe Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county, it appeared that this was an amicable action on a case stated, in the nature of a special verdict, in which Richard Updegrove, the plaintiff in error, was plaintiff, and Ellis Updegrove, trustee of Thomas F. Updegrove, and William B. Updegrove, defendant.
Read the full summary
In Error. On a writ of error to tbe Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county, it appeared that this was an amicable action on a case stated, in the nature of a special verdict, in which Richard Updegrove, the plaintiff in error, was plaintiff, and Ellis Updegrove, trustee of Thomas F. Updegrove, and William B. Updegrove, defendant. The facts agreed upon and submitted for the opinion of the court below, subject to a writ of error by either party, were as follows:— Jacob Updegrove, the father of the parties in this suit, died in March, 1833, intestate, leaving a widow and seven sons. On the 15th…
1Per curiam
We affirm this judgment, for the reasons given by the judge who ruled the case below.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hurst v. SpottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Hollenberger v. Yaukey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1891
- Smith v. DanielsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Vetter v. VetterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900