Hurst v. Spotts
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
This action of assumpsit was brought to recover the principal sum stated in a certain charge upon real estate. Daniel Diller, of Lancaster County, died intestate on November 21, 1896, leaving as his only child a daughter, Mrs. Katie D. Hurst and a widow, Mrs. Hettie A. Diller. He died seized, inter alia, of a certain one-hundred-and-eight-acre farm located in said county, which the daughter inherited, subject to the widow’s dower. To adjust the latter, the parties (the daughter’s husband joining therein), on December 17, 1903, entered into a written agreement,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Weckerly v. Ministers of the German Lutheran CongregationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
- Estate of DanhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- De Haven v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Carrow v. HeadleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Kreamer v. FlemingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schwoyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Yeisley EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Ohio-Pennsylvania Joint Stock Land Bank v. BloughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Skovborg v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Union Joint Stock Land Bank of Detroit v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.