Legal Opinion

In re Chung Toy Ho

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided May 23, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

These two cases were heard together. The petitioners are the wife and child of Wong Ham, a well-known Chinese merchant, resident in Portland, Or., for some years past.

A short time since, he visited China, and returned here on the American bark Coloma, bringing with him the petitioners, who had never been-in the United States. He, (Wong Ham,) being provided with the certificate required by section 6 of the act of July 5, 1884, (23 St. 116,) was allowed to land; but, the petitioners having no such certificate, their right to land was denied by the collector.

They then sued out writs of habeas…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Tung YeongDistrict Court, D. California · 1884

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tsoi Sim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  2. United States ex rel. Hong v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Ex Parte Goon DipDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
  4. United States v. Yee Quong YuenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. United States v. LimDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API