Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Goon Dip
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 23, 1924No. 8749, 8750, 8778, 8866PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The sole question is whether the Immigration Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 153) takes from the applicants the rights enjoyed by the treaty stipulations and statutory enactments prior thereto. Approaching the issue from the inceptive rights by treaty stipulations and statutory enactments, we find by the Treaty of November 17, 1880 (22 Stat. 826, art. 2), “Chinese * * * merchants * * * together with their body and household servants *■ * * shall be allowed to go and come of their own free will. * * * ” And in the Treaty of March 17, 1894 (28 Stat. 1211), extending the exclusion…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wong Wing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte (Ng) Fung SingDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
- Wise v. BolsterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1940
- Sidney Hing Lowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Kwan Shun YueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Ex parte PaloDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.