Legal Opinion

State v. Dalglish

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 27, 1995No. 1 CA-CR 94-0508-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

Alexander M. Dalglish (“Petitioner”) seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We address the issue of when Petitioner’s case was “final” for the purpose of determining retroactive application of a change in the law. We grant review but deny relief.

*189FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A grand jury indicted Petitioner on one count of murder in the first degree. The case was tried to a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the judge gave the following instruction to the jury: “If you decide that the defendant’s conduct was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. SlemmerArizona Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Celaya v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  3. Self v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API