State v. Dalglish
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
Alexander M. Dalglish (“Petitioner”) seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We address the issue of when Petitioner’s case was “final” for the purpose of determining retroactive application of a change in the law. We grant review but deny relief.
*189FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A grand jury indicted Petitioner on one count of murder in the first degree. The case was tried to a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the judge gave the following instruction to the jury: “If you decide that the defendant’s conduct was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SlemmerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Celaya v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Self v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002