Legal Opinion

People v. Acosta

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1963No. Crim. 8504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a non jury trial, convicting him of possession of heroin for purpose of sale in violation of section 11500.5 of the Health and Safety Code. We shall recite the essential facts reflected by the record viewed in the light most favorable to the respondent as required by the familiar rule.

On December 27, 1961, Officer John Hanks of the Los Angeles Police Department was informed by an arrestee that a dealer in heroin lived on Calzona Street in Los Angeles and could be called at a stated telephone number. The officer was advised also that this dealer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AleriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. FerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. WhyteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ValeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. People v. MacHelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. RodriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. ChaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API