Legal Opinion

State v. Hyde

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2017No. 20160437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶1] Floyd Hyde appeals a criminal judgment after entering a conditional plea of guilty to three drug charges. In his plea, *673Hyde reserved his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Hyde argues the district court erred in finding the warrantless entry of his home fell within the emergency exception to the warrant requirement. We reverse and remand to allow him to withdraw his plea.

I

[¶2] Two Ward County deputies entered Hyde’s residence in response to a report that he may be suicidal. At the time of their warrantless entry into Hyde’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KomroskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. SamuolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  3. People v. Ovieda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. State v. HydeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API