Legal Opinion

PORTENTOSO v. Kern

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 24, 2008No. 3:07CV00914Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

On March 28, 2007, Nicholas Portentoso filed a complaint on behalf of himself and his wife, Amy Portentoso. The Portentosos’ claims arise from a search of their residence by members of the Seneca County District Office of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority [“the APA”] on July 19, 2006. 1 Named defendants include Parole Officers Brian Kern, Douglas Pummel, and Frances Shook; Senior Parole Officer Beverly Bradner; Parole Services Supervisor Jennifer Olsen; and the Ohio APA.

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Portentosos’ first, third, and fourth claims for relief seek…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API