Legal Opinion

Neault v. Parker-Young Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The trial court had before it the inquiry how long the plaintiff would be disabled. By the act payments are to continue for three hundred weeks “if total or partial disability continues during such period” (s. 24), and upon a petition the award is to be a lump sum for the accrued and prospective weekly payments (s. 27). The plaintiff’s position that he is not required to act reasonably in effort to overcome his disability, is untenable. Reasonable conduct being that ordinarily exercised by men in general, all persons who are hurt are expected to take proper care of themselves. If they fail to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snooks's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stufflebean v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Perreault v. Allen Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Helms v. New Mexico Ore Processing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Vallée v. Spaulding Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  5. Acquarulo v. Botwinik Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API