Legal Opinion

United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 13, 2008No. 05-06-01138-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice FITZGERALD.

Appellant United States Fire Insurance Company provided a primary policy of liability insurance to a company that operated or owned a number of nursing homes. Appellee Scottsdale Insurance Company was an excess insurer for the same insured. Scottsdale paid monies to defend and settle certain claims against the insured and sued U.S. Fire as the insured’s subrogee, asserting that U.S. Fire had not paid all the monies it owed under the primary insurance policy. The trial court granted summary judgment for Scottsdale. We affirm in part, affirm as modified in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Wadewitz v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Balandran v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Schronk v. City of BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. American Safety Casualty Insurance v. City of WaukeganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. KLN Steel Products Co. v. CNA Insurance Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  4. Kelley & Witherspoon, LLP v. Charles and Jeanette Hooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  5. DMC Valley Ranch, L.L.C. v. HPSC, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API