Legal Opinion

In Re Putnam

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 18, 1932No. 138PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

Putnam, the petitioner, was the owner of a Diesel yacht on which the claimant’s intestate was injured in circumstances alleged to create liability under the Jones Act (section 33 [46 USCA § 688]). He died of his injuries and the claimant was appointed his administratrix, and made claim against Putnam which her attorneys set at $150,000. Thereupon and before she had taken out a writ, Putnam commenced these proceedings to limit his liability, posted a stipulation for $65,-000 and got the usual injunction against all actions. This the claimant then moved to vacate,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Helena Marine Service, Inc. Helena Marine Service, Inc., as Owner of the Barge Hms-6 v. Sioux City and New Orleans Barge Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Newton v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Newton v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  5. In Re Independent Towing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API