Legal Opinion

Lewin v. United States Surgical Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 5, 1990No. 8010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183 (b) from a decision of the defendant commissioner of the department of health services finding that the defendant United States Surgical Corporation’s (Surgical) use of dogs complied with state statutes and regulations.1 The Superior Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal for lack of aggrievement and they now appeal to this court.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 4-176, the plaintiffs, Julie Lewin and the Fund for Animals,2 requested that the commissioner of the department of health services render a declaratory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Hartford Distributors, Inc. v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Ierardi v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DiBonaventura v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Oak Leaf Marina, Inc. v. ErtelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Sachs v. SachsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Downey v. Retirement BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Lewin v. United States Surgical Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API