Ierardi v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from a decision of the defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (commission). The commission determined that there was no reasonable cause to believe that a discriminatory practice had been committed, and dismissed the plaintiffs complaint without a hearing. The principal issue involves the meaning of the term “reasonable cause” as used in General Statutes § 46a-83 (a), which governs the investigation of complaints of discriminatory practices.1
*571In 1979, the plaintiff was terminated from his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Town of Killingly v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Cassella v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Billings v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.