Legal Opinion

Ierardi v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 1988No. 4973PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from a decision of the defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (commission). The commission determined that there was no reasonable cause to believe that a discriminatory practice had been committed, and dismissed the plaintiffs complaint without a hearing. The principal issue involves the meaning of the term “reasonable cause” as used in General Statutes § 46a-83 (a), which governs the investigation of complaints of discriminatory practices.1

*571In 1979, the plaintiff was terminated from his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Town of Killingly v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Cassella v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Billings v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API