Legal Opinion

Demarkles v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 9, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 55-453Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This is an action removed from the state court on the grounds of diversity. It is alleged to be for fraud, misrepresentation and deceit leading to the plaintiff’s purchase of a number of juke boxes, so-called. The plaintiff, Demarkles, moves to remand, and the defendant, Wurlitzer, moves to quash the service of process.

Demarkles’ motion alleges a number of inconsequential grounds, and one that is of some interest. On February 15, 1955, Wurlitzer brought a suit in equity in the state court against Demarkles under Mass.G.L. Ch. 214, § 3(1), for what is locally known as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United Drug Co. v. CordleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Kimball v. SweetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Kimball v. SweetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API