Legal Opinion

Continental Savings & Building Ass'n v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1930No. 594PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

Manse Wood and R. L. Pitzer instituted this suit against Continental Savings & Building Association, a corporation, having its principal office in Dallas County, to recover the penalty provided under article 5073, R. S. 1925, on account of the alleged payment by appellees to appellant of usurious interest upon a loan. Upon findings by the court, before whom the case was tried without the intervention of a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of appellees against appellant for $3,-120.16, this being double the amount of all of the interest paid by appellees to appellant, according to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoforthTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Morton v. . ThurberNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Franklin Opera House Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Greever v. PerskyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wood v. Continental Sav. & Bldg. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Federal Mortg. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Ballard v. ShockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API